Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Vt. 65 - State v. Ashley

State v. Ashley’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2021

24 state decisions

801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of Sabiston · United States v. Tortora · State v. Ayala · United States v. Murray · State v. Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judicial officer authorizing the release of a person under this section shall issue an appropriate order containing a statement of the conditions imposed, if any, shall inform such person of the penalties applicable to violations of the conditions of release and shall advise him or her that a warrant for his or her arrest will be issued immediately upon any such violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'communicated intent to inflict physical or other harm.' " State v. Sanville , 2011 VT 34 , ¶ 9, 189 Vt. 626 , 22 A.3d 450 (mem.) (quoting State v. Ashley , 161 Vt. 65 , 72, 632 A.2d 1368 , 1372 (1993) ); see State v. Cole , 150 Vt. 453 , 456, 554 A.2d 253 , 255 (1988) (describing "[t]hreatening behavior”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may in addition impose ... conditions which will reasonably assure protection of the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.