Dahl v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1966
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCarthy v. Souther · Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. · 46 Cal. App. 707 - Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of America · Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co. · 94 Cal. App. 703 - May v. Farrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have held that to constitute a joint venture there must be an agreement to enter into an undertaking in the objects or purposes of which the parties to the agreement have a community of interest and a common purpose in its performance. Jensen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 133 Wash. 208 , 233 P. 635 ; Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage Line, 154 Wash. 57 , 280 P. 932”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brigham v. Munden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.