State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Padilla v. Kentucky · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · State v. Sutherby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“CP at 130. In a declaration in support of the motion, Mr. Martinez's original defense attorney declared he had,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martinez“of what he advised Mr. Martinez regarding immigration, but admitted he knew,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martinez“Were you able to go through this statement okay with [defense counsel]?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martinez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.