161 Wis. 2d 655 - State v. JEB’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 40 later decisions

states following

July 2022

most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 177 Wis. 2d 348 - State v. Patino (1993), 181 Wis. 2d 903 - State v. Fuerst (1994)

40 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Roth v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York · Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"(1) Past record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant's personality, character and social traits; (4) result of presentence investigation; (5) vicious or aggravated nature of the crime; (6) degree of the defendant's culpability; (7) defendant's demeanor at trial; (8) defendant's age, educational background and employment record; (9) defendant's remorse, repentance and cooperativeness; (10) defendant's need for close rehabilitative control; (11) the rights of the public; and (12) the length of pretrial detention."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 178 Wis. 2d 11 - State v. Bobbitt · 276 Wis. 2d 309 - State v. Lopez
“strong public policy against interference with the sentencing discretion of the trial court and sentences are afforded the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 199 Wis. 2d 566 - State v. Ogden · 271 Wis. 2d 819 - State v. Dixon
“is limited to determining whether there was an [erroneous exercise] of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Randolph · 271 Wis. 2d 819 - State v. Dixon

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.