Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Guzman

161 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Bell v. Wolfish · Williams v. People of State of New York · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “his drug use started as a recreational tool and that this criminal prosecution has cured him of any idea that he would want to use drugs again,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is judged by balancing its intrusion on the individual's Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement, make the warrant and probable-cause requirement impracticable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.