State v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Tierney ex rel. Newton v. Davidson (1998), Fletcher v. Town of Clinton (1999)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Welsh v. Wisconsin · Jizmejian v. United States · State v. Fisher · United States v. Robertson · State v. Castaneda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““These calls commonly involve dangerous situations in which the possibility for physical harm or damage escalates rapidly. The immediate presence of the officer is essential. To require an officer to obtain a search warrant before entering a dwelling in response to a domestic violence call would be a meaningless delay that could lead to the occurrence of otherwise preventable violence. [Citation omitted.] The call itself creates a sufficient indication that an exigency exists allowing the officer to enter a dwelling if no circumstance indicates that entry is unnecessary. [Citation omitted.]” 162 Ariz. at 433 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“These calls commonly involve dangerous situations in which the possibility for physical harm or damage escalates rapidly.... The call itself creates a sufficient indication that an exigency exists allowing the officer to enter a dwelling if no circumstance indicates that entry is unnecessary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.