Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 ARK 247 - Bray v. Timms

Bray v. Timms’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 1980 · most notably O'Connor v. Patton (1926), Bramlett v. Selman (1980)

2 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

1901924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Avery v. . Stewart · Harbour v. Harbour · Barron v. Stuart · Trapnall's adx. v. Brown · Carpenter v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A second well-settled and even common form of trusts ex maleficio occurs whenever a person acquires the legal title to land or other property by means of an intentionally false and fraudulent verbal promise to hold the same for a certain specified purpose, as, for example, the promise to convey the land to a designated individual, or to reoonvey it to the grantor, and the like, and, having thus fraudulently obtained the title, he retains, uses and claims the property as absolutely his own, so that the whole transaction by means of which the ownership is obtained is in fact a scheme of actual deceit. Equity regards such a person as holding the property charged with a constructive trust, and will compel him to fulfill the trust by conveying according to his engagement.” Bray v. Timms, 162 Ark. 247 , 258 S. W. 338 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.