In Re Lull Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2017
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 507
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc. · United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc. · Jartran Inc Reuben Donnelley Corporation · Juniper Development Group v. Kahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court shall disallow any claim for reimbursement or contribution of any entity that is liable with the debtor ... to the extent that— (B) such claim for reimbursement or contribution is contingent as of the time of allowance or disallowance of such claim.... 15”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Chemtura Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.