Olson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2010
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502
Relies on Gravel v. United States · Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc. · United States v. Vasquez · United States v. Doe · Abraham v. Aguilar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motions to reconsider should be granted where: (1) the Court has patently misunderstood a party, (2) the court has made a decision outside the adversarial issues ... presented by the parties, (3) the court has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension, or (4) there is a controlling or significant change in the law or facts since the submission of the issue to the Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fowler v. R
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.