Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 CALAPP2D 586 - People v. Ahouse

People v. Ahouse’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Flohr · People v. Wallach · 22 Cal. App. 2d 392 - People v. Sberno · 88 Cal. App. 212 - In Re Hall · 119 Cal. App. 350 - In Re Daniels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We, the Jury in the above entitled action, find the Defendant Roy Leroy Carter guilty of violation of Section 209, Penal Code (Kidnaping for the Purpose of Robbery), a felony as charged in Count I of the information. This 20 day of October 1965 W R JONES [s] Foreman Verdict (Guilty) ” “We, the Jury in the above entitled action, find the charge against the Defendant Roy Leroy Carter of having been armed at the time of his arrest as contained in Count I (Kidnap) of the (Information true. •(-Indictment This 20 day of October 1965 W. R. JONES [s] Foreman””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.