Maye v. Pescor’s Empirical Analysis
162 F.2d 641 · 1947
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 1981 · most notably 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope (1979), People v. Ibarra (1963)
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Avery v. State of Alabama · Bowen v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [T]he mere appointment of counsel, no matter how able, for a defendant charged with commission of crime without opportunity to consult, advise or to make such preparation for arraignment and trial as the facts of the case fairly demand would be a travesty and would not satisfy the requirements of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. * * * [Citing authorities].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Orcutt v. State · Ford v. Parratt“The record does not purport to set out all the facts presented to or known by the United States Attorney, and we cannot go outside the record for the facto”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. S
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.