Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 F.2d 711

Docket No. 13196.

Docket No. 13197.

Docket No. 13231.

Docket No. 13232.

Docket No. 13263.

Docket No. 13264.

Docket No. 13265.

Docket No. 13283.

Docket No. 13284.

Docket No. 13285.

Docket No. 13286.

Docket No. 13287.

Docket No. 13288.

Docket No. 13289.

Docket No. 13290.

Docket No. 13291.

Docket No. 13292.

Docket No. 13293.

Docket No. 13294.

Docket No. 13295.

Docket No. 13296.

Docket No. 13297.

Docket No. 13298.

Docket No. 13303.

Docket No. 13304.

Docket No. 13324.

Sutton v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1947.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1947-04-14

6 counsel of record

Relies on Albrecht v. United States · Oliver v. United States · Shearer v. Porter

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1947-04-14

¶1Samuel M. Watson, of St. Louis, Me., for appellants in Nos. 13196, 13197, 13263-13265, 13283-13288, 13291-13293, 13295-13298, 13324.

¶2Robert V. Niedner, of St. Charles, Mo. for appellants in Nos. 13231, 13232.

¶3Walter J. Voelkerding, of Dutzow, Mo., for appellants in No. 13289.

¶4Samuel M. Watson, of St. Louis, Mo., and W. F. Karrenbrock, of St. Chari®*-., Mo., for appellants in Nos. 13290, 13294.

¶5William Waye, Jr., of St. Charles, Mo., and William R. Gilbert and Roscoe Anderson, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants in Nos. 13303, 13304.

¶6*712Harry C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Silces-ton, Mo., Russell Vandivort, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Louis, Mo., and J. Edward Williams, Acting Head, Lands Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., for the United States in all the above actions.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8On motion of appellee, judgment of District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri affirmed on authority of decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of February 3, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 606, in the cases of Albrecht v. United States (Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Company v. United States; Linnenbringer, et al. v. United States, Pitman, et al., v. United States) 155 F.2d 77; 61 F.Supp. 199, and Oliver v. United States, 155 F.2d 73, 60 F.Supp. 741, holding that the landowners were not entitled to interest in addition to amount under McDowell Option Contract.

/162/f2d/711 · .json · Public domain