Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 F.2d 717

Docket No. 10394.

Long v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1947.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1947-04-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1965

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Holbrook v. United States · Coy v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1947-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Willard Long, in pro. per., of Leavenworth, Kan., and Wm. Deupree, Jr., of Covington, Ky., lor appellant.

¶2John C. Lehr, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On appeal from an order denying a motion to again correct a sentence previously corrected at the instance of the appellant, and for a writ of habeas corpus, and it appearing that the circumstances are not distinguishable from those involved in Coy v. United States, 6 Cir., 156 F.2d 293, and nothing appearing to cast doubt upon the soundness of the decision in the Coy case, wherefore upon the authority of the Coy case and Holbrook v. United States, 8 Cir., 136 F.2d 649, it is ordered that the judgment below be, and it is in all respects, affirmed.

/162/f2d/717 · .json · Public domain