Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 F.2d 753 - Survaunt v. Commissioner

Survaunt v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

162 F.2d 753 · 1947

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
November 1983
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 1983 · most notably Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1965), J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant (1966)

18 federal appellate ·

26019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering · Dobson v. Commissioner · Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering · Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co. · Bazley v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor, or one or more of its shareholders (including persons who were shareholders immediately before the transfer), or any combination thereof, is in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred; but only if, in pursuance of the plan, stock or securities of the corporation to which the assets are transferred are distributed in a transaction which qualifies under section 354, 355, or 356.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.