Gates v. Rowland

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submission Deferred Dec. 11, 1997.

Decided Dec. 31, 1998.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1998-12-31

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2002

8 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Constance L. Picciano, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for defendants-appellants.

¶2Michael W. Bien, Rosen, Bien & Asaro, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-ap-pellees.

¶3Robert M. Loeb, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellant-intervenor.

¶4Irene M. Solet, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.

¶5Before: FLETCHER and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY,* District Judge.

¶7ORDER

¶8These appeals are hereby submitted and now dismissed pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. Attorneys’ fees and expenses shall be awarded to appellees as determined by the district court in the underlying action, pursuant to the periodic fees procedure already in effect, all as stipulated by the parties.

¶9The mandate shall issue forthwith.