Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 F.3d 113 - Lake v. Rubin

Lake v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis

162 F.3d 113 · 1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · Bowen v. Massachusetts · Church of Scientology v. Internal Revenue Service · Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue Service · McMillen v. United States Department of Treasury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'comprehensive, carefully tailored and detailed' provisions 'designed to protect both the interest of' those seeking the information and the interest in 'confidentiality.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that [tax information] should generally be treated as confidential ... except in those limited situations delineated in ... section 6103....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “individuals seeking `return information' ... must do so pursuant to § 6103 ... rather than the Privacy Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.