Quesinberry v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
162 F.3d 273 · 1998
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Miranda v. Bennett (2003), Monroe v. Angelone (2003)
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Lindh v. Murphy · Sumner v. Mata · Pennsylvania v. Finley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hillman v. Hinkle“make[] a specific allegation that shows reason to believe that [he] may be able to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f there is no prejudice, a court need not review the reasonableness of counsel's performance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hillman v. Hinkle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.