Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 F.3d 574 - Patterson v. Knowles

Patterson v. Knowles’s Empirical Analysis

162 F.3d 574 · 1998

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Broomes v. Ashcroft (2004), Weekes v. Le Fleming (2002)

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

290199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Kell v. United States Parole Commission · McKinney v. Taylor · Boniface v. Carlson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the Commission's interpretation of the statutory scheme for parole and good time that the only function of good time credits is to determine the point in a prisoner’s sentence when, in the absence of parole, the prisoner is to be conditionally released on supervision, as described in subsection (a). Once an offender is conditionally released from imprisonment, either by parole or mandatory release, the good time earned during that period of imprisonment is of no further effect either to shorten the period of supervision or to shorten the period of imprisonment which the offender may be required to serve for violation of parole or mandatory release.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.