Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 F.3d 999 - Mueller v. Tinkham

Mueller v. Tinkham’s Empirical Analysis

162 F.3d 999 · 1998

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Scott Sexton v. Ronald Martin City of Des Peres Missouri (2000), Koch v. Rugg (2000)

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Anderson v. Creighton · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on appeal that their actions were objectively reasonable in light of their knowledge at the time of the incident”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “abstract issues of law and does not extend to arguments concerning the sufficiency of evidence.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e affirm the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity if there exists a genuine issue of material fact or the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.