Ali v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 263 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Soadjede v. Ashcroft · Yu Zhao v. Gonzales · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“decline to further address the persuasiveness of the reasoning in Subhan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ali v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.