Liner v. Dravo Basic Materials Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 14 U.S.C. § 86 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 33 U.S.C. § 409 · 33 U.S.C. § 414 · 33 U.S.C. § 419
Relies on United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Gaubert · United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Indian Towing Company v. United States · De Bardeleben Marine Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Government's duty to warn of a navigational hazard is satisfied by accurately noting the hazard on the appropriate navigational chart.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.