Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 ILL 241 - Hately v. Pike

Hately v. Pike’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1971

16 state decisions

70189619001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPike v. Hately

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Cole · Falk v. Moebs · Powers v. Briggs · Mason v. Burton · Vater v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pay to the order of Adolph Pike, President”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.