Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 ILL 267 - Einbecker v. Einbecker

Einbecker v. Einbecker’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
10
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 1988 · most notably Penn v. Fogler (1899), State v. Underwood (1939)

35 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1401896190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedEinbecker v. Einbecker

Relationships

Relies on Delaney v. . Van Aulen · DeHaven v. Sherman · Irwin v. Wollpert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the will provides that the residue of the fund shall go to those who are to take after the death of the annuitant, or when it provides that the fund shall be paid over ‘subject to the payment of the annuity,’ or ‘after the payment’ of the annuity, then the corpus will be liable for arrearages.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.