Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ill. 2d 299 - People v. Turnage

162 Ill. 2d 299 - People v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 223 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Sutherland (2006), 202 Ill. 2d 59 - People v. Collins (2002)

58 state decisions

2201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Calandra · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the burden ... to prove that exclusion of the evidence is not necessary because of [that] exception.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““Common sense dictates that issuing a second arrest warrant on identical charges after a defendant has been arrested and released on bond produces a warrant that is invalid ah initio. To hold otherwise would provide police with a ‘pocket warrant’ that could be executed at any time and place, despite the fact that the target is already subject to the jurisdiction of a court for the crime charged. In addition, such a practice undermines a citizen’s constitutional right to bail.” People v. Turnage, 162 Ill. 2d 299, 305-06 (1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the appropriate analysis where an officer arrests a suspect based upon a warrant obtained by someone else is to determine whether there is a valid warrant at the source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.