Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ill. 2d 542 - Williams v. Nagel

162 Ill. 2d 542 - Williams v. Nagel’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
6
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably 198 Ill. 2d 511 - First Nat. Bank v. Guerine (2002), 167 Ill. 2d 372 - Bubb v. Springfield School District 186 (1995)

7 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

280199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Collins v. City of Harker Heights · Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a condition to moving into the apartment complex, tenants agreed to abide by the terms set forth in their lease as well as the rules and regulations promulgated by the management. One of the terms to which tenants agreed was that [the apartment complex], as lessor, reserved the right to bar persons from its property. Any tenant’s attempt to invite an individual onto the property who had already been barred by management would result in breach of the lease.... As a result, any attempt by tenants to invite [persons] onto the premises would be invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.