Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ill. App. 3d 238 - Simmons v. Aldi-Brenner Co.

162 Ill. App. 3d 238 - Simmons v. Aldi-Brenner Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2011

19 state decisions

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merlo v. Public Service Co. · 76 Ill. 2d 154 - Kerns v. Engelke · 60 Ill. 2d 552 - Fancil v. Q.S.E. Foods, Inc. · 54 Ill. 2d 539 - Mieher v. Brown · 56 Ill. 2d 22 - Barnes v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining whether the law imposes a duty, foreseeability of possible harm alone is not the test, for in retrospect almost every occurrence may appear to be foreseeable. The likelihood of injury from the existence of a condition, the magnitude of guarding against it, and the consequences of placing the burden upon the defendant must be taken into account.” 162 Ill. App. 3d at 241-42 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"When considering all the factors present in this case, we come to the conclusion that a duty did not legally exist requiring Aldi to protect against the injury caused by the * * * automobile. As plaintiffs' expert stated, it would be mere speculation to say that his recommended safety features would have prevented the entry of the car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ ‘To make the proof of other independent accidents competent, the condition or thing shown to be the common cause of danger in such accidents must be the condition or thing contributing to the danger of the accident complained of.’ ” Simmons, 162 Ill. App. 3d at 246 , 515 N.E.2d at 409 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.