162 Ill. App. 3d 362 - Darguzas v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 69 Ill. 2d 534 - Nelson v. Araiza · 74 Ill. App. 3d 98 - Thorsen v. City of Chicago · 16 Ill. 2d 169 - Moran v. Katsinas · 11 Ill. App. 2d 441 - Lichter v. Scher · 58 Ill. App. 3d 192 - Merritt v. Chonowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the determination of the case rests largely upon findings of fact, the reviewing court will not disturb the trial court’s determination as long as there is evidence in the record to support it. [Citation.] We find that there is sufficient evidence in the record before us to support the jury’s verdict against defendant dramshops.” Darguzas, 162 Ill. App. 3d at 364 , 515 N.E.2d at 452 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.