Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ill. App. 3d 449 - People v. Pluskis

162 Ill. App. 3d 449 - People v. Pluskis’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2002

19 state decisions

160198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Ill. 2d 149 - People v. Perruquet · 116 Ill. 2d 528 - Airey v. Department of Revenue · 91 Ill. 2d 47 - People v. Godinez · 58 Ill. 2d 178 - People v. Gant · 131 Ill. App. 3d 887 - People v. Krankel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) The offender shall be given credit on the determinate sentence or maximum term and the minimum period of imprisonment for time spent in custody as a result of the offense for which the sentence was imposed ***. (c) An offender arrested on one charge and prosecuted on another charge for conduct which occurred prior to his arrest shall be given credit on the determinate sentence or maximum term and the minimum term of imprisonment for time spent in custody under the former charge not credited against another sentence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[bjecause one sentence does not begin to run until the other has been completed, to give him credit as to both sentences would serve to reduce his sentence by twice the time of the defendant’s prior incarceration.” Pluskis, 162 Ill. App. 3d at 455 , 515 N.E.2d at 484 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.