Marsh v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably 166 Ind. App. 409 - Linton v. Linton (1975), Thompson v. Thompson (2004)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Musselman v. Musselman · Miller v. Clark · Hansford v. Van Auken · Farr v. Buckner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that the alimony contemplated by statute is in the nature of an ordinary judgment, which may be enforced by execution, creates a strong implication against the existence of the prior and more drastic remedy of contempt. . . .” 162 Ind. at 212”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.