Kite v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"This court has construed Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , as requiring an in-court advisement and waiver of defendant's right to trial by jury, right to confront his accusers, and privilege against compulsory self-incrimination prior to the acceptance of a plea of guilty. The court's duty to advise is non-delegable and is not discharged by a showing, as in the instant case, that the defendant's constitutional rights were explained to him by court appointed counsel prior to arraignment. See, Bonner v. State (1973), Ind. App., 297 N.E.2d 867 ; Thomas v. State (1974), Ind. App., 306 N.E.2d 136; Goode v. State (1974), Ind. App., 312 N.E.2d 109 ; Toon v. State, 317 N.E.2d 875 (Ind.Ct. of App., decided Oct. 31, 1974)." Ind. App., 318 N.E.2d 390, 391 (emphasis added).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Williams v. State