Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 Ind. App. 287 - Beech v. State

162 Ind. App. 287 - Beech v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
4
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Commonwealth v. Warner (1984), State v. Ibarra (1984)

42 state decisions

22019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · King v. Smith · Townsend v. Swank · 1 Cal. 3d 475 - People v. Gilbert · United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant’s additional allegations of error are presented with absolutely no legal argument or citation of authority. Under Rule AP 8.3(A)(7), this court need not consider such matters, and they are deemed waived. The cases are uniformly in accord with this proposition. Yeary v. State (1971), Ind., 273 N.E.2d 96 ; Miller v. State (1971), Ind., 268 N.E.2d 299 . We cannot answer bald assertions of error that are not supported by legal authority. To do so would be to encourage inadequate and poor work on the part of the attorney.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““When a person commits acts which constitute the violation of more than one criminal statute, the State has the option to charge and prosecute under any or all of the statutes which have been violated. “It is sufficient if the indictment or affidavit charges and the evidence proves an offense under the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[the State need not prosecute under the more specific of two statutes, nor under the statute carrying the lesser penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.