162 Ind. App. 357 - Senst v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1990
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · McAfee v. State · Gregory v. State · Sumpter v. State · 157 Ind. App. 59 - Guyton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[w]hoever keeps a house of ill-fame, resorted to for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness,' etc., shall be fined, etc.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pruitt v. State“by reason of the continuing nature of the offense of keeping a house of ill fame.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pruitt v. State“the continuous keeping of the same house,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pruitt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.