Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 KAN 407 - Bever v. Yount

Bever v. Yount’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1959
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Beardsley v. Kansas Natural Gas Co. · Barrett v. McMannis · Union Central Life Insurance v. Irrigation Loan & Trust Co. · Green v. National Annuity Ass'n · Estate of Schroeder v. Schroeder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not clear, however, that these sections confer power on a probate court to have a hearing without notice of a matter wherein the result of the hearing would be to deprive an interested party of a valuable right. To so hold would be to confer power on the probate court which is not conferred on any other tribunal that we know of. Certainly the framers of the probate code had no such intention. See 12 Kansas Judicial Council Bulletin, 102 (July, 1938); also 2 Bartlett’s Kansas Probate Law and Practice, 1015.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.