Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 KAN 415 - Hamilton v. Binger

Hamilton v. Binger’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably Browning v. Lefevre (1963), Darby v. Keeran (1973)

48 state decisions

27019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Biby v. City of Wichita · Palmer v. Helmer · Brewer v. Harris · Lambeth v. Bogart · City of Wichita v. Boles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . [W]hen a contract for the sale and purchase of land provides a vendor shall furnish the vendee with an abstract showing marketable title the abstract must show on its face a good title in the vendor ( 55 Am. Jur. 734 , §297; Thompson on ‘Abstracts and Titles,’ 14, §9), and . . . the showing of such a title in the abstract is a condition precedent to be performed by the vendor before he will be permitted to recover any balance claimed by him to be due on a contract, for the sale of real estate (66 C. J. 957, § 664; Thompson on ‘Abstracts and Titles,’ 12, § 8; Patton on ‘Titles,’ 119, §25).” (pp. 421, 422.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Darby v. Keeran
  2. ““The appellant’s abstract shall include a specification of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Estate of Pardun

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.