Cole v. Coons’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2007
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fry v. Dewees · Hafer v. Hafer · Cole v. Thacker · Hixon v. George · Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A homestead right of occupancy may be established on a cotenancy title, an equitable title, an executory contract to purchase, a leasehold estate, or an estate for life, as against almost any class of claimants except cotenants.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * cannot obtain such homestead right or interest as will prejudice or interfere with the rights or interests of his cotenant or any person rightfully claim-: ing under the latter, such as the right to partition or an accounting. Thus it is held that one joint owner of property cannot claim a homestead as against the other joint owners * * (Footnotes omitted.) 40 C.J.S., Homestead § 88, p. 527.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.