Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 La. 73 - Conques v. Andrus

Conques v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1984

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

801926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Hussey · Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co. · Joffrion v. Gumbel · Amiss v. Witting's Ex'rs · Consumers Ice Co v. Jacques Trautman & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The last preceding article is limited to potestative conditions, which make the obligation depend solely on the exercise of the obligor’s will; but if the condition be, that the obligor shall do or not do a certain act, although the doing or not doing of the act depends on the will of the obligor, yet the obligation depending on such condition, is not void.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Parties are at liberty to make any kind of contract they see fit to make, and which is not contrary to law, public policy, or good morals. And it is a familiar principle that as a person binds himself so shall he be bound and remain bound until discharged by law or released by consent of the person to whom he is bound.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Every obligation is null, that has been contracted, on a potestative condition, on the part of him who binds-himself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.