Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 Mass. 506

Commonwealth v. Crane

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 1, 1895

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1895-01-01

Complaint, under St. 1891, c. 412, § 4, to the East Boston District Court, for delivering from a certain vehicle, upon a public street in Boston, oleomargarine made in semblance of pure butter, and not having on both sides of said vehicle a placard in uncondensed Gothic letters not less than three inches in length, the words, “ Licensed to sell oleomargarine.” At the trial in the Superior Court, before Richardson, J., the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the defendant…

Relies on Commonwealth v. Huntley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1895-01-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1959

1 district · 3 state decisions

201895190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Allen, J.

¶1By St. 1891, c. 412, § 4, “ Whoever peddles, sells, or delivers from any cart, wagon, or other vehicle, upon the public streets or ways, oleomargarine, butterine, or any substance made in imitation or semblance of pure butter, not having on both sides of said cart, wagon, or other vehicle the placard in uncondensed Gothic letters not less than three inches in length, ‘ Licensed to sell oleomargarine,’ shall be punished,” etc. The defendant introduced evidence tending to show that there are two kinds of oleomargarine, one of which (being the kind which he admitted that he delivered from his wagon) is the article usually known by that name, looking like pure butter, and not easily distinguished therefrom except by experts; and the other is oleomargarine dishonestly and designedly made in imitation of the best pure butter, for the purpose of being palmed off on the public as butter. Upon this evidence, the defendant contended that the section of the statute above cited is applicable only to the second kind of oleomargarine. But this is too narrow a construction of the statute. Whoever delivers oleomargarine from a vehicle upon the public streets must have upon his vehicle the placard described. This statute was not intended to draw fine distinctions between different kinds of oleomargarine, all of which would resemble butter; but it requires that every one who thus delivers oleomargarine, of whatever sort, shall carry along with him upon his vehicle a public notice that he is licensed to sell oleomargarine; in other words, that he shall go under his true colors. See Commonwealth v. Huntley, 156 Mass. 236, 239.

¶2Exceptions overruled.

/162/mass/506 · .json · Public domain