Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

162 N.C. 526

78 S.E 280

Linney v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1913-05-07

■Held, this case presented only issues of fact, determined by the verdict. Appeal by defendants from íyon, J., at Fall Term, 1912, of ALEXANDER. Held: this case presented only issues of fact, determined by the verdict. Appeal by defendants from íyon, J., at Fall Term, 1912, of ALEXANDER.

Decided 1913-05-07

Per Curiam.

¶1This was a special proceeding started before tbe Clerk of Alexander Superior Court to establish tbe boundary • lines between tbe plaintiff and tbe defendants, and beard on appeal to tbe Superior Court upon tbe following issue: “Is tbe line from Black 4 to Black 5 tbe true dividing line between tbe plaintiff and tbe defendant.”

¶2We are of opinion that tbe question at issue is one of fact, and that it'bas been determined by tbe finding of tbe jury.

¶3Upon a review of tbe record we find

¶4No error.

/162/nc/526 · .json · Public domain