Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 N.C. App. 355 - In Re Miller

162 N.C. App. 355 - In Re Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

65 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Gibbs · 135 N.C. App. 734 - State v. Linemann · 81 N.C. App. 531 - Matter of Baby Boy Scearce · 156 N.C. App. 213 - Sarda v. City/County of Durham Board of Adjustment · In re Will of Barnes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny county department of social services, consolidated county human services agency, or licensed child-placing agency to whom custody of the juvenile has been given by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Standing is jurisdictional in nature and '[c]onsequently, standing is a threshold issue that must be addressed, and found to exist, before the merits of [the] case are judicially resolved.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because DSS no longer had custody of the child, DSS lacked standing, under the plain language of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-1103(a), to file a petition to terminate respondent's parental rights.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.