Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 N.C. App. 73 - Wall v. Fry

162 N.C. App. 73 - Wall v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 138 N.C. App. 19 - Poor v. Hill · Lowe v. Bradford · 145 N.C. App. 525 - Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. Johnston · 31 N.C. App. 463 - Huss v. Huss · 128 N.C. App. 570 - Edwards v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`by proving that an essential element of the opposing party's claim is non-existent, or by showing through discovery that the opposing party cannot produce evidence to support an essential element of [its] claim. . . .'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." "A party moving for summary judgment may prevail if it meets the burden (1) of proving an essential element of the opposing party's claim is nonexistent, or (2) of showing through discovery that the opposing party cannot produce evidence to support an essential element of his or her claim." "If the moving party satisfies its burden of proof, then the burden shifts to the non-moving party to `set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial,'" or, alternatively, must produce an excuse for not doing so. "The nonmoving party `may not rest upon the mere allegations of his pleadings.'" Thus where, "the moving party by affidavit or otherwise presents materials in support of his motion, it becomes incumbent upon the opposing party to take affirmative steps to defend his position by proof of his own. If he rests upon the mere allegations or denial of his pleading, he does so at the risk of having judgment entered against him."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the moving party satisfies its burden of proof, then the burden shifts to the non-moving party to `set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.