State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
1 district · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · McDonald v. City of Chicago · United States v. Smith · State v. Seymour
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prevail upon his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the defendant must prove that no rational trier of fact, viewing all of the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to the State, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When the evidence is solely circumstantial, it must exclude all rational conclusions except guilt. Under this standard, however, we still consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and examine each evidentiary item in context, not in isolation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ruggiero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.