State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[d]efendant's assertion that he lacks sophistication in the law does not satisfy the exceptional circumstances”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 454 N.J. Super. 284 - State v. Jackson · 365 N.J. Super. 203 - State v. Merola

2. “If on the remand the trial court is convinced that an attorney conflict of interest existed that created a presumption of prejudice, the court should apply the injustice exception in Rule 1:1-2 and Rule 3:22-4(b) to overcome the five-year time limit of Rule 3:22-12 ... If the Court determines that the injustice or extenuating circumstances exception applies, it must then decide whether defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. [ 162 N.J. at 251 , 744 A.2d 131 .]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Murray

3. “although not in excess of the statutory maximum penalty, [is] not ... a disposition authorized by the Code.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 410 N.J. Super. 389 - State v. Eckert