Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 NW2D 377 - Schue v. Jacoby

Schue v. Jacoby’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Gajewski v. Bratcher (1974), City of Bismarck v. Thom (1977)

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

90196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chester v. Einarson · Putnam v. Dickinson · Tice v. Mandel · Larson v. Wood · City of Granville v. Kovash, Incorporated

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proof of the existence of any separate oral stipulations or agreements as to matters on which a written contract is silent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “9-06-07. Written contract supersedes oral negotiations. — The execution of a contract in writing, whether the law requires it to be written or not, supersedes all the oral negotiations or stipulations concerning its matter which preceded or accompanied the execution of the instrument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Existing law at the time a contract is entered into, covering the subject-matter of a contract, becomes a part of such contract and must be read into it as if its provisions were set out in full in the instrument itself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.