Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 NW2D 390 - State v. Hellickson

State v. Hellickson’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 1981
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1981

13 state decisions

100196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berman v. United States · 52 Cal. 2d 521 - People v. Thomas · Monroe v. Huff · People v. Zolotoff · State v. Kulish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actually, the issue here presented is whether an appeal lies from a post-sentence arrest of judgment order. . . . Furthermore no appeal lies from an order denying an arrest of judgment motion on a ground which could have been reviewed on appeal from the judgment. . . . In the instant case defendant chose not to appeal from sentence, electing to exercise his statutory right to later seek arrest of judgment upon the premise his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. This, if true, did not appear on the record. Id. at 392-393 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This inferentially means a defendant may, by motion in arrest of judgment, with the aid of extrinsic evidence, establish a violation of constitutional or fundamental rights which are not apparent but inhere in the whole record, as a result of which no legal judgment could be pronounced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “defendant appeared in court with retained counsel, waived arraignment, time to plead, and for sentence, then entered a written plea of guilty to the offense charged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.