Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 N.W.2d 484 - State v. Bowers

State v. Bowers’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
October 1975
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · State v. Gebhart · Hunley v. State · State v. Lindloff · State v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It * * * is our duty to give full force and effect to the directive of section 795.1 even though it results * * * in the release of one found guilty of a serious offense [assault with intent to commit murder] by a jury.” ( 162 N.W.2d at 487 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 667 of the Code of Crim.Proc. provides as follows: “When a person has been held to answer for a crime, if an indictment be not found against him, at the next term of the court at which he is held, to answer, the court may on application of the defendant order the prosecution to be dismissed, unless good cause to the contrary be shown.” (Italics mine.) The meaning of the words “held, to answer” is to be found in Section 208 of the Code of Crim.Proc. That section provides in its pertinent parts that “if . it appear from the examination that a crime has been committed and that there is sufficient cause to believe the defendant guilty thereof, the magistrate [will order] that he be held to answer the same.” (Italics mine.) Thus, it is clear that “held to answer” refers to situations where the magistrate holds a defendant either for the Court of Special Sessions or for the actions of the Grand Jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It was the burden of the State to assert and prove as a matter of record good cause if so contended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.