162 Ohio App. 3d 105 - State v. Gooch’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2023
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · State v. Comer · State v. Ballard · State v. Johnson · 161 Ohio App. 3d 274 - State v. Lett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he reasonable interpretation of the text [of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(A)] is that `the maximum penalty' is for the single crime for which `the plea' is offered. It would seem to be beyond a reasonable interpretation to suggest that the rule refers cumulatively to the total of all sentences received for all charges which a criminal defendant may answer in a single proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.