Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 OHIOAPP3D 133 - Courie v. Alcoa

Courie v. Alcoa’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2025

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

130200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. · Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg · Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc. · Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may disregard an assignment of error `if the party raising it fails to identify in the record the error on which the assignment of error is based or fails to argue the assignment separately in the brief, as required under App.R. 16(A).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and [must] be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There are those whose position vis-à-vis the employee and the employer entitles them to intrude upon the employment relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.