Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 162 OHIOAPP3D 229 - In Re Terrence

In Re Terrence’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2023

15 state decisions

70200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · State v. Schiebel · In re Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Fundamental due process requires that when a parent is waiving the fundamental right to care for and have custody of a child, the trial court must have a meaningful dialogue with that parent to be certain that the consent is truly voluntary. See Elmer v. Lucas Cty. Children Serv. Bd , supra. If a parent expresses uncertainty or misunderstandings about his or her decision to waive parental rights, the trial court's acceptance of a waiver is improper. Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a case where parental rights are permanently terminated, it is of utmost importance that the parties fully understand their rights and that any waiver is made with full knowledge of those rights and the consequences which will follow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he waiver of one's parental rights should not be based upon misunderstandings. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.