162 Ohio App. 3d 375 - State v. Small’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 164 Ohio App. 3d 278 - Wilson v. Harvey (2005), Keeney v. State (2010)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Meachum v. Fano · Ingraham v. Wright · Collins v. City of Harker Heights · Washington v. Glucksberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the Ohio Constitution, an enactment comports with due process `if it bears a real and substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public and if it is not unreasonable or arbitrary.' * * * Federal due process is satisfied if there is a rational relationship between a statute and its purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“narrow the range of issues to be litigated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Rarden v. Rarden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.