162 Ohio App. 3d 404 - State v. Dommer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “any device designed or specially adapted to cause physical harm to persons or property by means of an explosion, and consisting of an explosive substance or agency and a means to detonate it. `Explosive device' includes without limitation any bomb, any explosive demolition device, any blasting cap or detonator containing an explosive charge, and any pressure vessel that has been knowingly tampered with or arranged so as to explode.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gump, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)

2. “No person shall manufacture or process an explosive at any location in this state unless the person first has been issued a license, certificate of registration, or permit to do so from a fire official of a political subdivision of this state or from the office of the fire marshal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gump, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)

3. “any * * * device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gump, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)